I'm currently having trouble getting the following pair of rules to parse correctly:
> expr : expr IN expr > for_s : FOR many_exprs IN many_exprs block else In for_s, I test the first many_exprs to make sure that it is something that can be assigned to. Where many_exprs is defined: > many_exprs : many_exprs ',' expr > | expr The problem is that I have a shift reduce error due to the rules for expr and for_s above, for_s loses. and for statements don't parse. Any good fix for this? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ply-hack" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
