str, int should be parsed as expressions COMMA expression ? However it seems that your expression definition requires that you have a NAME followed by '<', a bunch of expressions and then '>'.
I may be wrong but according to what you've given, it seems that str and int cannot be reduced as expression On Nov 24, 1:21 am, Alex Gaynor <[email protected]> wrote: > I've got the following productions: > > declaration : expression NAME EQUAL expression > expression : NAME LESS expressions GREATER > expressions : expression > | expressions COMMA expression > > And I'm trying to parse: `dict<str, int>`. I'm getting the folloing > debug output:http://paste.pocoo.org/show/152572/. I'm trying to > figure out why expressions COMMA expression isn't being reduced to > expressions. The incidents of expressions are the only place > expressions appears in my grammar. > > Alex > > -- > "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your > right to say it." -- Voltaire > "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero > "Code can always be simpler than you think, but never as simple as you > want" -- Me -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ply-hack" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en.
