Hmmm. Interesting. I'm not sure I would adopt that interface as the default, but it might be possible to support it as an alternative specification. Let me think about it so more. I like how it uses decorators.
Cheers, Dave > > Not sure if you're considering doing more than bugfixes and dropping > Python support here, but lately I've been thinking about what a more > explicit parser API might look like, here's the result: > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/276240/ > > Alex > > -- > "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your > right to say it." -- Voltaire > "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero > "Code can always be simpler than you think, but never as simple as you > want" -- Me > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ply-hack" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ply-hack" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en.
