Aubrey, I just used cp for the kernel only. I think you may have got it right. This ON is definitely not 111b (its later).
Any clue how to get the ON source for 111b (vanilla 2009/06)? Downloading gets the latest - which isn't handy.... Regards, Tom Li, Aubrey wrote: > Tom de Waal <> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> For over a year I've build and somewhat maintained code that allows >> clockscaling for older, not p-state variant CPU's. These CPU are >> supported by OpenSolaris but run only a full speed. This introduces >> annoying issues like high levels fans noise and high power usage. >> I used to have a cpudrv that would replace the standard cpudrv and did >> magic. The magic being the use of Casper Dik's clockscale code and >> some tweaking from my side. This has proven to work on Intel, AMD and >> VIA CPU's. For over a year at some cases. >> >> Since build 109 all this has broken. No doubt with good reason, but >> still. I managed to re-engineer the code so that I can compile a new >> kernel, >> but booting (in vanilla 2009/06) it results in an weird error (this >> manually copy/paste do i may have made a typo): >> >> not found: print_msg_hwerr >> krtld: error during initial load/link phase >> >> krtld could neither locate nor resolve symbols for: >> /platform/i86pc/kernel/amd64/unix >> in the boot archive. Please verify this file >> matches what is found in the boot archive. >> You may need to boot using the Solaris failasafe to fix this. >> Unable to boot >> Press any key to reboot. >> >> To prevent wrong discussions: >> - its a new BE on the 2009.06 environment. Thats quite OK (I can boot >> that before and afterwards) >> - I did rebuild the boot archive before booting (by mounting the BE /) >> - This behaviour occurs both in a VirtualBox and on a bare metal AMD >> box. > > How did you apply your change into the new BE? Are you using the > Cap-Eye-Install > to replace kernel image only or BFU? 2009.6 is based on snv_111, which build > of kernel > are you using? > > As far as I know, "print_msg_hwerr" implementation was added recently after > onnv_115, > if you are using onnv_116 and later kernel but using snv_111 BE, I think that > would be > a problem. > > -Aubrey > > >> I'm looking for anybody that can give some support on getting this >> working. I'm not looking for an official support of this code >> (however - it would be nice...), but anybody with old style laptops, >> PC's or VIA CPU's most likely will be great full! >> >> I can (and will) mail all changes I've made to ON, but I hate to >> clutter this alias by appending these right now. >> >> Regards, >> >> Tom de Waal >> _______________________________________________ >> pm-discuss mailing list >> pm-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-discuss > Tom de Waal
