On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 20:12 +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:26:35AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 19:56 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > There are some short-term benefits. For example, we are able to use the > > > RSA > > > for encryption and we support suspend-to-disk-and-RAM on some machines > > > with the ability to reinitialize the graphics card if necessary. > > > > We already have that without it being in userland. > > No. Encryption and write-image-to-disk-but-then-suspend-to-ram are only > possible with uswsusp (and suspend2).
Sorry for being vague; I was referring to the graphics reinitialization. > > > I'm going to implement the ability to cancel the suspend (ie. cancel the > > > image > > > saving). That should be easy in the user space. ;-) > > > > Not quite sure... how does this help? > > Well, everybody seems to want that feature. It looks like lots of people > trigger a suspend, but change their mind afterwards ;-) It just seems weird to me. Suspending should be quick enough that canceling it isn't a practical thing to actually do. -- Peter _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
