On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:01:19AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 07:56:11 +0200 > Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok. I am going to try to move all our powersaved scripts to pm-utils, > > and making it work with uswsusp (which is our default now) would have > > been one of the tasks anyway :-) > > Very good. Takes something from my todo list;)
:-) > > And 01grub > > does not restore the old config after resume anyway > > OK, than my point is moot. And since every distro has a little bit different tweaks for grub (or maybe just plain simple naming conventions for the boot entries or such), i think the grub hook belongs in the grub package. I have a pretty complicated logic to find out which kernel to boot next in powersaved scripts, that is apparently obsoleted by /sbin/grubby on fedora and that also will not work on other distros due to different naming conventions for the kernel binary. And since i do not believe that all distros will agree on a common kernel- binary-naming-scheme, it is probably best to let the grub packager provide the grub hook since he probably knows best what to do here :-) > I'm also in discussion with davidz (HAL author) on the hal list. I > think we just agreed that hal should just call pm-utils with the needed > 'video quirks' on the command line. (eg: pm-suspend --acpi_s3boot > --vbe_save). > That way we can have the logic of skipping video suspend if s2* is > installed at only one point; in pm-utils. I like this. I am trying to get the whitelist mostly out of s2ram (or only leave it in there as an emergency debugging tool) anyway :-) -- Stefan Seyfried \ "I didn't want to write for pay. I QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices \ wanted to be paid for what I write." SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg \ -- Leonard Cohen _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
