On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:18 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > - shouldn't the "session daemons" actually do this? Send a "going to > > suspend" > > signal which NM (and others) will listen to? > > gnome-power-manager currently does this, but it NetworkManager doesn't > mind being asked twice.
Hrm. Actually, that may be a source of some bugs. Not 100% sure though, let me think about it some more. But if it is or not, pm hooks should be doing this, not g-p-m, because (at least according to plan) it will be common to use NM independently of the desktop. > > 90clock: > > - setting the hwclock before suspend is only needed if your cmos clock runs > > badly wrong. If you do not have ntpd running (no network, notebook), then > > it might make things even worse. Resetting system time after resume from > > the cmos clock is not needed, the kernel does this already. > > (We had this option in powersaved since up to 2.6.7(?) the kernel did not > > do this correctly. After the kernel was fixed, we set the default to > > "off". > > I never had a bugreport about it ever since, so i wanted to remove it from > > powersaved anyway). > > I know nothing about this one. Peter? It's mostly crackrock, but what really needs to happen is for ntpd to join the modern world. Then we throw this out entirely. -- Peter _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
