On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:09 +0200, Holger Macht wrote: > Hi, > > I'm just looking over the 94cpufreq hook which sets the userspace governor > immediately before suspend. I think this was needed because of dead locks > of the ondemand governor in the past, right?
Yes -- in fact, I don't think it's a problem any more, so we can probably just remove it soon, or just disable it in distro's packaging, but leave it in CVS. Maybe we should add some auto* stuff to disable individual scripts' installation by default. > Wouldn't it be better to set the performance governor then? Because if > frequency is low and you set the userspace governor, frequency will keep > to be low if you have no userspace daemon caring about. > > Anyway, setting the performance governor would be a good idea in any case > because of compression and stuff we will have in the near future. Doesn't matter -- the machine isn't going to be _running_. And when it is running again, we're going to go back to the same governor that we had before. So basically, we're talking about ~2 seconds of runtime that this will effect. Since that's the case, I'd rather just leave it as "userspace", if only for the reason that it doesn't _do_ anything. Less stuff being done means less chances of having to hack on this again when a bug is introduced. -- Peter _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
