On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 20:09 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > I think that this should of course be handled by s2ram - bypassing the > internal whitelist if you want.
Hmm. I think s2ram (or any "action" program) should just do the suspend and let pm-utils do all the other "stuff". > If not, this should be the very last hook that runs before suspend, > thus not > being 20video but > 99ZZvideo. Agreed. Richard. _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
