On Feb 7, 2008 12:36 PM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2008 10:27 AM, Richard Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 18:56 -0600, Victor Lowther wrote: > > > Have we ever had i18n in this package? > > > > I don't think so, but I think automake complains if we nuke the po/ > > directory. > > No po/ directory in pm-utils :) I'm pretty sure automake doesn't care > about the po/ directory, but intltool would. Ah, now I see why they > were in EXTRA_DIST! autogen.sh is calling glib-gettextive and > intltoolize. I was just running autoreconf. > > Can we slim down autogen.sh? It's way overkill for what we have in > pm-utils, and autoreconf will "do the right thing" for us. Here's the > "official" xorg autogen.sh which hasn't had any complaints: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/tree/autogen.sh > > We could throw in a $NOCONFIGURE test to skip running configure if > that's something people like.
Heh, I have actually never tested building pm-utils with autogen.sh at all -- I always use autoreconf --install. > -- > Dan > _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
