On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 22:39 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2008/3/16, Victor Lowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 19:04 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I improved the pmu support a bit (for uswsusp/kernel) > > > > > > - If /dev/pmu is existent, assume we can suspend > > > - Don't try to run pm-pmu for non-pmu machines. The majority of > > > machines nowadays doesn't have a pmu, so always running pm-pmu for > > > them is just wasting cpu cycles. > > > > > > Patch? > > Argh, missed it. Attached now.
Patch looks good to me. > I haven't changed do_suspend for uswsusp, as my uswsusp patch will use > s2ram (which deals with pmu machines transparently). > > Cheers, > Michael -- Victor Lowther Ubuntu Certified Professional _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
