Hello, Concerning the up/down scaling of those numbers, is the following correct?
Increase those numbers: this will reduce the chance of pmacct to 'lose' data samples. Decrease those numbers: this will reduce the latency. This is how I interpreted the FAQS/INTERNALS files. Regards, Ruben Laban On Monday 11 June 2007, Paolo Lucente wrote: > Hi Daniel, > Q5 of the FAQS document briefly outlines some very basic rules of > thumb regarding bufferization, buffer values and how they should > compare. You can have a try with the following values and eventually > scale them downwards/upwards: > > plugin_buffer_size: 10240 > plugin_pipe_size: 1024000 > > Cheers, > Paolo > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:08:36PM +0200, Daniel wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > anyone here experince with plugin_buffer_size and plugin_pipe_size? > > Which values are recommand? I see in the log errors like: > > > > Jun 11 22:44:20 ddos sfacctd[29351]: - increase shared memory size, > > 'plugin_pipe_size'; now: '4063108'. Jun 11 22:44:20 ddos sfacctd[29351]: > > - increase buffer size, 'plugin_buffer_size'; now: '124'. > > > > Whats the maximum what i useable? > > > > greetz daniel > > _______________________________________________ > pmacct-discussion mailing list > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists _______________________________________________ pmacct-discussion mailing list http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
