Also, the x2 should not be required if the same datapoint can be looked at twice, once for each member/direction
A---->B Out of A towards B could easily be reversed to show into B from A using the same data. -Brent On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, John Rouillard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:57:01AM +0800, Kerk Chun Sing wrote: > > May I know why there is a need to multiple by 149? > > We run a IX as well. > > > > Jérôme Fleury wrote: > > >That means I have a lot of counters in my aggregation: if I have 150 > > >members on the IX, I have 150*149*2 (in& out) = roughly 45000 > > >counters to compute. > > If you have 150 members on the network there are 150x149 pairs of > members right N*(N-1) since a member sending traffic to itself should > never appear on the exchange. > > -- > -- rouilj > > John Rouillard System Administrator > Renesys Corporation 603-244-9084 (cell) 603-643-9300 x 111 > > _______________________________________________ > pmacct-discussion mailing list > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists >
_______________________________________________ pmacct-discussion mailing list http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
