Hi Brian, Ruben, This is now available in the CVS via a new set of configuration directives [nf|pm|sf|u]acctd_proc_name. Log of the commit here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00771.html Thanks once more to Brian for bringing this up. Cheers, Paolo On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:38:15PM +0000, Paolo Lucente wrote: > Hi Brian, Ruben, > > It's a good proposal, it makes sense. Will introduce a config > directive to allow to customize the core process name default > being, for backward compatibility, "default". If you have any > different ideas please let me know. Otherwise will give you a > shout here once this is available in the CVS, estimate by (or > during) the coming weekend. > > Cheers, > Paolo > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 09:06:42AM +0200, Ruben Laban wrote: > > On 7/2/2013 11:13 PM, Brian Rak wrote: > > >Is there a configuration option that will let me change the '[default]' > > >bit in 'nfacctd: Core Process [default]'? I didn't see anything obvious > > >looking through http://wiki.pmacct.net/OfficialConfigKeys > > > > > >I have several different pmacct processes running, and it's tricky to > > >keep track of which one is which (I end up having to look at the plugin > > >PIDs). > > > > Last I checked (been a while) this was hard-coded all over the > > place. Making it configurable surely would get my vote as well. > > > > Regards, > > Ruben Laban > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pmacct-discussion mailing list > > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists > > _______________________________________________ > pmacct-discussion mailing list > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists _______________________________________________ pmacct-discussion mailing list http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
