Hi Vincent, You are right with your assumption. Support of NFLOG has been requested, ie. to support IPv6, but is still pending and i don't have it currently on my radar (ie. 1.6.0 / 1.6.1).
Cheers, Paolo On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 05:55:51PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ??? 26 f??vrier 2016 17:53 +0100, Vincent Bernat <[email protected]>??: > > > Has someone already done some simple benchmarks to check the performance > > of libpcap-based capture with libpcap >= 1.0.0 (mmap support) and Linux > > kernel >= 2.6.27 (64bit support). There is another milestone which is > > libpcap >= 1.5 and Linux kernel >= 3.10 (support for TPACKET_V3)? > > > > How would this compare with the performance with ULOG? > > I did try to use uacctd. It seems that it is unable to receive what I > send over NFLOG. Am I correct to assume that it supports only ULOG > (despite the NETLINK_NFLOG mention in the source code)? All other > NFLOG-enabled programs are using libnetlink-log library which configures > everything over netlink instead of with bind/setsockopt. > -- > Grief can take care of itself; but to get the full value of a joy you must > have somebody to divide it with. > -- Mark Twain > > _______________________________________________ > pmacct-discussion mailing list > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists _______________________________________________ pmacct-discussion mailing list http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
