Hi Benedikt,

Yes, fields are directly populated with what is in the NetFlow packet. Super strange the Cisco is putting the Source AS in PeerSrcAS (confirmed also with tcpdump), maybe a bug?

You could probably get around it defining a custom primitive but it would be very dirty. I would make the Cisco device export right the informationi instead.

Paolo


On 22/11/23 10:49, Benedikt Sveinsson wrote:
Hi (hope this is not a duplicate email)

I’m running a new build of nfacct  - version below.

Exporting into Kafka

Collecting from two platforms Cisco and Huawei

I’m doing this nfacct -> kafka -> flowexporter -> Prometheus -> Grafana thing and initially had this in containers but now fresh setup natively on the Ubuntu host.

I straight up hit a snag – using same config files for nfacct as in the old setup – I now got as_src always 0

When looking at the kafka entries I noticed I have two as src fields – peer_as_src and as_src

{"event_type":"purge","label":"dublin","as_src":0,"as_dst":12969,"peer_as_src":32934,"peer_as_dst":0,"ip_src":"x.x.x.x","ip_dst":"x.x.x.x","port_src":443,"port_dst":59073,"stamp_inserted":"2023-11-09
 11:50:00","stamp_updated":"2023-11-09 12:32:36","packets":100,"bytes":5200,"writer_id":"default_kafka/592569"}

Our AS is 12969 – I have a networks file for our own networks etc.

I’m seeing the source AS as peer_as_src being populated with the source AS, but as_src always 0

Now to my confusion when I added the Huawei router to the collector :

{"event_type":"purge","label":"arbaer","as_src":24940,"as_dst":12969,"peer_as_src":0,"peer_as_dst":0,"ip_src":"x.x.x.x","ip_dst":"x.x.x.x","port_src":50196,"port_dst":443,"stamp_inserted":"1995-01-29
 09:45:00","stamp_updated":"2023-11-09 12:36:36","packets":200,"bytes":12000,"writer_id":"default_kafka/592828"}

I get as_src and as_dst correct  - this is an issue as I modified the flow-exporter code to pick up peer_as_src

Now looking at the tcpdump of the Netflow packet from the cisco router – it uses field name PeerSrcAS (not been able to decode the Huawei packets for some reason)

Can someone help me understand the Kafka fields – and from where they are populated ? is this directly related to what is in the actual netflow packet from the device – or something config related in nfacct ?  - sorry if I’m missing something from the documentation and bit scrambling to get this running.

* Benedikt
root@netflow:/etc/pmacct# nfacctd -V

NetFlow Accounting Daemon, nfacctd 1.7.9-git [20231101-0 (a091a85e)]

Arguments:

'--enable-kafka' '--enable-jansson' '--enable-l2' '--enable-traffic-bins' '--enable-bgp-bins' '--enable-bmp-bins' '--enable-st-bins'

Libs:

cdada 0.5.0

libpcap version 1.10.1 (with TPACKET_V3)

rdkafka 1.8.0

jansson 2.13.1

Plugins:

memory

print

nfprobe

sfprobe

tee

kafka

System:

Linux 5.15.0-88-generic #98-Ubuntu SMP Mon Oct 2 15:18:56 UTC 2023 x86_64

Compiler:

gcc 11.4.0

config of nfacct:

!daemonize: true

!syslog: daemon

pre_tag_map: /etc/pmacct/pretag.map

nfacctd_as: longest

nfacctd_net: longest

networks_file: /etc/pmacct/networks.lst

networks_file_no_lpm: true

aggregate: peer_src_as,peer_dst_as,src_host, dst_host, src_port, dst_port, src_as, dst_as, label

snaplen: 700

!sampling_rate: 100

!

bgp_daemon: true

bgp_daemon_ip: 10.131.24.11

bgp_daemon_port: 179

bgp_daemon_max_peers: 10

bgp_agent_map: /etc/pmacct/peering_agent.map

!

plugins: kafka

!bgp_table_dump_kafka_topic: pmacct.bgp

!bgp_table_dump_refresh_time: 300

kafka_cache_entries: 99991

kafka_topic: netflow

kafka_max_writers: 10

kafka_output: json

kafka_broker_host: localhost

kafka_refresh_time: 5

kafka_history: 5m

kafka_history_roundoff: m

!print_refresh_time: 300

!print_history: 300

!print_history_roundoff: m

!print_output_file_append: true

!print_output_file: /var/netflow/flow_%s

!print_output: csv

nfacctd_ext_sampling_rate: 100

nfacctd_renormalize: true

nfacctd_port: 6666

nfacctd_time_secs: true

nfacctd_time_new: true


_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Reply via email to