Thanks Armin, For the first, as e brief description, it is the proposal of the general town-planning scheme. The service is providing by the city of Pula (local government), where I work.
Thanks for the versions clarification. I have some more questions: 1. Since I am not a web developer, I can't discuss much over frames and divs, but I am interested in how can the "design"part be separated form the "content" part in p.mapper? I would really like if I can change the "visual identity" of my p.mapper sites without the need to change a lot of HTML code (that I am not expert in). I see pmapper is using CSS....what can be set in the css except the colors, sizes, etc. For example, is it possible to change the positions of the elements in a simple way? I am planning to make some more maps and pmapper seems good for me so I would like to continue using it... 2. What about the translation mechanism? Is it now separated from the mapfile? 3. Since my next install of mapserver is on the Windows machine, I have installed ms4w yesterday...I went to maptools.org and there are "packaged" versions of some web apps (cartoweb,ka-map,maplab) for ms4w. I have seen a document on how to package your own application...wouldn't it be good to do it for pmapper? And to set pmapper link on this site like other tools are? If you want I can try to do it... regards, dejan > -----Original Message----- > From: Armin Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 6:47 PM > To: Gambin Dejan > Subject: Re: Demo for the list and the version advice > > > Hello Dejan, > > I will add it to the gallery site. Because I do not > understand Croatian, do you have a very brief description of > what the site shows and who is providing the service? > > It is a bit difficult to say which version to recommend. My > plans in principal focus currently more on pmapper 2. The > approach using DIV's and no more frames facilitates the > inclusion in standard web sites and the use of other DOM > functions like DHTML windows instead of standard pop-up's. > But the increase of flexibility is less than I initially > expected, mainly due to all the resizing stuff and moving > around the DIV's. > > I often get a bit annoyed with browsers interpreting things > different when using DOM and DHTML. I'm not an expert for > that and some things are just trial and error and finding > workarounds (especially for Internet Explorer). If things go > really bad (what I don't hope) I will remain more on the > frames approach of version 1. > > In principal I would say that if you do lot's of > modifications and customizations in the source code then > version 1 might be more appropriate because there are > probably less significant changes. pmapper 2 will very likely > undergoe more changes, although the main framework should now > be clear and stable. And if things go well the customization > part shall be more separated from the core part as it is > currently in version 1. Until then some changes might still occure. > > Armin > > > > > > > Hi Armin (and the others too), > > > long time no hear...I just want to mention I have a functional > > p.mapper site for a half of year already...so here is the > address if > > you want to add it to your list: > > http://gis.pula.hr/pmapper/index.phtml > > > Another thing....I want to create a new site using p.mapper so what > > are the suggestions for using - p.mapper version 1 or 2? > > > regards, dejan > >
