Hi Stephan, here my other 0.02¢. Armin is away these days and we all will wait HIS replay but I talked with him these days and he was always much clear on these points and never told something different. The official list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are right all the other are a lose of time and effort, also because Armin read with attention just post on this list.
About WIKI there is http://88.198.37.99/wiki/doku.php (everyone can get a registration and write) and none post on it from the beginning so why talk about other wiki. For CVS, I can just report Armin opinion that it requires much effort and he has no time for now. It could be useful but you cannot ask people what that are not at ease to do in this moment. I repeat, this is my 0.01¢ luca On 10/21/06, Stephan Holl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello *, > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:07:43 -0700 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > essage: 8 > > Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:11:02 +0200 > > From: Armin Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [pmapper-users] bug in pmapper 2.1.1 > > To: Alessandro Pasotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: pmapper-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > I uploaded version 2.1.2 with this bug fix and one for Postgis layers. > > I will not stress it too much again, but I have some questions > regarding the pmapper-development strategies for upcoming releases. > > Currently there are at least 2 mailinglist (sourceforge, faunalia), > probably some more at wald?! > Which one is the 'master' mailinglist? We should > > I would like to see a concentration of our power to one list, one SVN, > one tracker, one wiki, one whateverweneed. > > This will definetly bring p.mapper to a wider range of people. As Paolo > also mentioned this will help bugfixes/extensions/scripts apply to > upstream version managed by Armin. > > I know it was discussed thousand times, but why dont we use a > centratlized source-code storage, e.g. at sourceforge or wald? This > would make lots of things easier and p.mapper would definetly benefit > from this approach. > > just my 0.02¢ > > Cheers > Stephan > > -- > Stephan Holl : www.intevation.de/~stephan | GISpatcher: > www.gispatcher.de Intevation GmbH: www.intevation.de | GAV > e.V.: www.grass-verein.de Georgstr.4 : 49074 Osnabrück | > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > pmapper-users mailing list > pmapper-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pmapper-users > -- luca marletta www.beopen.it ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ pmapper-users mailing list pmapper-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pmapper-users
