Il 13:08, mercoledì 28 marzo 2007, Armin Burger ha scritto:
> p.mapper *does support* Mapserver groups defined in the map file. This
> required quite some efforts and workarounds since Mapscript has no support
> for groups as the CGI has.

Thanks for claryfying, I was aware of some group support in pmapper, but I 
tried several times to make it work without success, perhaps I don't 
understand the logic behind it:

if I set useCategories = 0 and set appropriates groups, the name of the first 
layer is used as the group name instead of the group name itself, 
additionally, I loose the ability to switch on-off the individual layers (but 
maybe this is how it is supposed to work).

What I would like to have is the useCategories behaviour without the need to 
(manually) configure them but taking the configuration from the groups 
defined in the mapfile (i.e. read categories from groups in the mapfile).

I know it can be done (and I know how to do it), the question is as usual: do 
you think this feature could be added to pmapper as a third possibility to 
create the thematic groups in the toc (think about useCategories = [yes, no, 
auto]), as usual I'm not asking you to write this, I could do that, but only 
after having heard your opinion and sugestions.

A problem I see is that I (we?) often need full i18n support in the toc, this 
could be "easily" done with categories, but could be more tricky for groups 
taken from mapfile.



-- 
Alessandro Pasotti
itOpen - "Open Solutions for the Net Age"
w3:  www.itopen.it
Linux User# 167502

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
pmapper-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pmapper-users

Reply via email to