On 11/07/2011 21:27, Pedro Venâncio wrote: > Just another small question, there are some parameters like the > "RESULT_FIELDS" and "RESULT_HEADERS," but for WMS layers?
for WMS layers these metadata are not taken into account. In principal they could. But so far WMS layers are treated somehow differently, just taking default values of the WMS provider. > PS: It would be great to go updating the linux repositories with the latest > versions of p.Mapper. > this should be included in the next release 4.2, I just need to find time to update a few shell scripts and do some more testing. You can install the current dev (which will be +/- the next release) as Debian/Ubuntu package "pmapper-dev", I just ran the update script for it. armin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ pmapper-users mailing list pmapper-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pmapper-users
