This works for me too. I will clear my DISCUSS when I see
the -11 version posted.
Thanks
Brian
Harald Alvestrand wrote:
My concerns with the draft are satisfied.
Harald
--On 8. november 2006 22:56 -0500 Matt Mathis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have revised draft-ietf-pmtud-method-10 per the IESG DISCUSS comments.
Please see the revised document with change markings at:
http://www.psc.edu/~mathis/draft/draft-ietf-pmtud-method-10bis.diff.html
(or draft-ietf-pmtud-method-10bis.html and .txt if you prefer unmarked)
I think I have responded to all requested changes, but you might want to
inspect to make sure that I interpreted them correctly.
Lars, is there anything else I should do before submitting this?
Thanks,
--MM--
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
draft-ietf-pmtud-method-10 has gathered some discusses and comments
during IESG evaluation. The most serious one is probably David
Kessens'. I encourage the authors to try and resolve these with the
discussing ADs.
Lars
[DISCUSS details omitted, see the IETF ID tracker at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi]
_______________________________________________
pmtud mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmtud
