Patrick R. Michaud said... > But what does concern me a bit here is that people not find themselves > being misled as to what the recipe does and does not do. It's been > my experience that when people think of "hierarchical groups", > what they're really expecting is to be able to write urls like: > > http://www.example.com/wiki/Kingdom/Main > http://www.example.com/wiki/Kingdom/Animal/Main > http://www.example.com/wiki/Kingdom/Animal/Canine/Main > http://www.example.com/wiki/Kingdom/Plant/Main
FWIW, I agree with you. > As far as I can tell, this recipe doesn't really achieve this > goal (yet?), so calling it "hierarchical groups" feels a bit > like false advertising or something. Yes. I prefer the naming suggestion of "clusters". Including the term groups in the name is confusing - I have already been confused :-| -- Cheers, Marc _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
