On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:22:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> On Feb. 27 also pmwiki.org had the same problem > >> http://pmichaud.com/pipermail/pmwiki-users/2007-February/039577.html > >> ...and still does now... on beta33... > >> http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Test/JumpBox > > >Oh. I think we need to fix the (:input jumpbox:) markup > >then. Either that or I need to move the & rule even earlier > >in the sequence. > > Some languages in the world have special inclusive "we"s and exclusive > "we"s. Other languages (English) have just a basic, simple "we" > which might (or might not) include the speaker, the listener, and > other people.
And ambiguity is nice sometimes. However, in this case I was primarily using the academic "we", sometimes found in scientific and mathematic papers where the author (singular) often writes the paper in the first-person plural "we". :-) Or perhaps, I really meant to use the royal "We". Or maybe it's really the multiple-personality "we". (We do wear many hats. :-) At any rate, after thinking about it further, I decided moving the & rule even earlier in the sequence was a more natural solution. Now released as 2.2.0-beta34, and the jumpbox on pmwiki.org appears to be working properly. Thanks for your help! Pm _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
