On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:55:27PM -0400, Ben Wilson wrote:
> On 3/26/07, Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ben Wilson wrote:
> > > Along with [@ @] indicating <pre></pre>, then [@@ @@] could indicate
> > > <pre><code></code></pre>. This seems to work for me as the latter is
> > > "a little more" than the former.
I'm leaving any [@@...@@] markup for recipes to handle,
rather than adding it to the core.
> > What's the difference between <code> and <pre> ? I've checked all my
> > favourite HTML references and found ... they probably don't know either.
>
> There's not a lot of difference. ...
> [...]
> However, using <code> allows web designers to style that block
> differently than <pre> blocks.
Somehow I think I'd prefer to see this done using classes -- i.e., something
like <pre class='code'>...</pre> instead of <pre><code>...</code></pre>.
Note that it's also possible to use wikistyles on [EMAIL PROTECTED]@] blocks:
%block bgcolor=yellow% [@
This is preformatted
text.
@]
or
[@
This is preformatted
text.
@] %block bgcolor=yellow%
and even
%block frame% [@
This is preformatted
text.
@]
Pm
_______________________________________________
pmwiki-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
