A couple of points: 1. I also think that Publish is good.
2. Save and Edit is ambiguous and needs to be clarified. 3. In PITS 00755, "Pm's proposal ... modified to clarify labels" suggests a single "Save" label with different meanings for an original document vs a draft document. I think that this is confusing. I'd also rather always see "Save as Draft" even for untrusted authors. Another issue to consider is that an entire wiki might NOT have $EnableDrafts turned on - it might only be used for specific groups and I think it is a good thing that the authors realize that they are saving a draft page that needs to be "published" by the moderator/publisher - using Save for everything doesn't lead them to expect the different behavior. 4. Pm: Are you considering a Publish password so that publishers are given special permissions via a password attr (including id and groups in AuthUser)? 5. Something that hasn't been discussed at all is the history - should the history show what is a Draft vs what is the real document? Scott Connard. _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
