On 2007-04-06 Patrick R. Michaud is rumoured to have said: >> That's exactly what I dislike in most opensource projects. Slow development, >> > missing features and unfixed bugs is ok for a hobby project though far >> > from >> > adequate for anything productive. > > I didn't realize that closed-source projects were any better in this > regard. If you have a feature that you want added to a closed-sourced > product, does it occur any quicker than with open source ones? Could you > give an example that you've personally witnessed or experienced? >
Open-source software has several advantages over commercial/closed-source software: 1) Price 2) Ability to examine the source code (important to security mavens). 3) Possibility of adding your own features if you have the skill and time. 4) Large potential pool of developers 5) Few constraints on use I don't think it is fair to lump open-source in with "hobby-projects". Certainly some are - but then so are some "commercial" projects. I have paid for several pieces of commercial software that later disappeared completely, either through bankruptcy or absorbtion. -- Neil Herber Corporate info at http://www.eton.ca/ _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
