On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:32:28PM -0300, Jos? Geraldo Gouv?a wrote: > Kathryn Andersen escreveu: > > I agree with all these reasons! That's why I personally went the > > GeneratePDF route, which uses htmldoc for the conversion to PDF. > I used GeneratePDF for a while, but it still falls short of my goals. > > It isn't as pretty, but it's a heck of a lot easier to set up. I agree > > that having LaTeX would be nicer, since TeX produces lovely output. > > > And you haven't seen what xelatex (texlive-xetex) can do using random > fonts installed in your system.
Yes, I'd never heard of xelatex or xetex before you mentioned them. I've now gone and found out more; it looks cool. I'm trying to figure out whether it will be possible to replace my tetex with texlive (tetex is supported by my Linux distribution, but texlive isn't). > The same way it works with LaTeX input, presneting it as HTML just like > PmWiki markup, it could work for LaTeX output, replacing PmWiki markup > with LaTeX markup and presenting the resulting document between > <pre>tags</pre>. Such behaviour would be associated with a page action > (action=print or action=export, for instance). > > But for some reason I can't figure out, if you put a long list of rules > like this, some rules work while others don't. So I was a bit > disencouraged from extending the recipe or from creating the reverse rules. Maybe start afresh, looking at scripts/stdmarkup.php again...? Kathryn Andersen -- _--_|\ | Kathryn Andersen <http://www.katspace.com> / \ | \_.--.*/ | GenFicCrit mailing list <http://www.katspace.com/gen_fic_crit/> v | ------------| Melbourne -> Victoria -> Australia -> Southern Hemisphere Maranatha! | -> Earth -> Sol -> Milky Way Galaxy -> Universe _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
