On Saturday 28 April 2007 19:10, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > > I was thinking not of session data, but more of a hidden form field as > > in: (:input default request=1 source=DataPage:) > > translated to: > > <input type="hidden" name="_ptv_were_prefilled" value="1"/> > > > > when there is a "source=DataPage" parameter, it was pre-filled. > > Oh, something like that might work. I'll keep it in mind.
Oh, this could easily be done by a recipe, if you feel it is not for the core, provided that there is an option "treat empty field as modification to empty". > [...] > > For me, the most consistent behaviour would be, from a posted "editform", > > to always escape "(:" inside PTVs, advanced editor or not. If it is > > always escaped, there is no problem, only in the "editform" mode, to > > "unescape" back the "(:" into "(:". > > Oh, I understand what you're referring to now. You're saying > that it should be switched back only when using an editform. > That's possible... but it also has a bit of the "spooky action > at a distance" sort of take to it. Sorry I am not a native English speaker (not always understand everything, sometimes not easy to explain what I mean), I will be more carefull. (Sometimes I understand code better... ;-) ) > My current thought is that we simply add spaces, so that > "(:" and ":) are converted to "( :" and ": )" and leave it > at that. That preserves safety, still looks reasonable when > editing, and makes it relatively clear as to what is going on. Yes, I agree with that. Thank you! Petko _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
