Endorsements is a good word. One of the reasons I joined this list was to get a feel for the contributors, but that's a luxury many new users don't have. They'd still have to get a feel for the endorsers, but more names means more chance of recognizing one.
Let's make one thing clear: A proper evaluation of a recipe involving security or private data can take several hours of a senior programmer's time, and setting up examples and explaining them takes even more time, time that could be spent paying the rent. It's frustrating to be told little more than, "It won't work," but, no matter how friendly and helpful the community, there will always be recipes that don't get evaluated, simply because no expert has that much time to invest in a recipe they don't expect to use. Sandy Martin Fick wrote: > I like the idea of endorsements! > > -Martin > > --- "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>This does bring up another thought... as opposed to >>having "ratings" or "voting" on recipes [1], what if > > we > >>called them "endorsements"? > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
