On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:53:29AM -0400, Russ Fink wrote: > Hi, why are there two recipes that do basically the same thing, > includesite, and includeurl? They seem functionally equivalent, but > mutually agnostic.
Presumably there are two recipes because they were written by two different people. I don't know which one is better. Me, I use IncludeUpload, but I wrote it myself, to serve my own needs, even though it's similar to IncludeFile, that recipe doesn't do what I need. I expect the reasoning for IncludeSite and IncludeUrl was similar. > Can someone fix this up, or recommend which one should > be used? Who has authority to "fix it up"? Nobody apart from the two authors of the two different recipes. Since neither IncludeSite nor IncludeUrl have Maintainers listed, I don't know who they are, or whether that is possible. Kathryn Andersen -- _--_|\ | Kathryn Andersen <http://www.katspace.com> / \ | \_.--.*/ | GenFicCrit mailing list <http://www.katspace.com/gen_fic_crit/> v | ------------| Melbourne -> Victoria -> Australia -> Southern Hemisphere Maranatha! | -> Earth -> Sol -> Milky Way Galaxy -> Universe _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
