On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:37:14PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2007 15:58:37 -0500 > "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > These cannot be cached because they generate <meta ... /> > > tags in the <head> section of the resulting HTML, as opposed > > to most other markups which appear in a continuous section > > of the <body>. So, in order to generate those entries > > in the output HTML we have to actively process the markup. > > > > Yes, it would be nice if there was a way for us to keep > > track of any output that needs to be cached for the > > <head> section, but there's also the issue that the > > order of entries in <head> matters as well. So, it's not > > a simple problem. > > What about caching the complete page, and if the date/time is more > recent ... > or > What about a directive that say: > (:alwayscache:) > Then the user is responsible...
We'd have to cache the HTTP headers as well. But that might be doable. Pm _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
