On Fri, May 18, 2007 01:34, IchBin wrote: >>> The Cookbook has several instances of multiple approaches. This is >>> redundancy in the best sense -- multiple solutions from multiple >>> perspectives, so the user can pick the best match for their particular >>> needs. >>> >>> I don't believe there was ever a JITS version that did NOT require ZAP. >> >> It's also worth noting that Jiri has done a wonderful job maintaining >> this recipe, keeping up with both PmWiki and ZAP upgrades (not an easy >> task), providing support, and constantly adding new features--which >> makes it an especially nice choice. I tried looking at PITS for ideas >> long ago, when I was scoping out the development of ZAP, and found it >> quite awkward and a bit incomprehensible. >> >> Just an unsolicited plug for Jiri's issue tracking system. >> >> Cheers, >> Dan > > Don't get me wrong and hope no one takes it personal. I just wanted to > ask those questions. I am new to pmWiki but unfortunately old having 30 > years of operating and application programming experience. Maybe I just > tripped over my experience when I tried to asked those few questions... >
I think I will speak not only for myself if I say that these questions are more than welcomed. Though it is natural that everyone will defend present work or his/her own view on the course taken, these questions seem very healthy to me to uncover the dependencies / complexities / or just recipe alternatives / advancements that are easy to be overlooked by the single recipe developers. Thomas _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
