+1 for Site.SiteHeader. The Editor wrote: > On 6/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Dominique Faure wrote: >> >>> On 6/15/07, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Friday, June 15, 2007, 8:19:40 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: >>>> >>>>> I wasn't planning on (:nositeheader:), leaving it >>>>> tied to the (:nogroupheader:). That might argue in >>>>> favor of Site.AllGroupHeader instead (and there's >>>>> precedent with respect to Site.AllRecentChanges). >>>>> It also increases the regularity of the list=normal >>>>> parameter, excluding both GroupHeader and AllGroupHeader. >>>> Good. Site.AllGroupHeader gets my vote. >>>> Sites using it already can just drop the recipe. >>>> >>> +1 for me too. >> I prefer 'Site.SiteHeader'. >> >> /C > > > For what it's worth, I found AllGroupHeader counterintuitive, and > would also prefer Site.SiteHeader. > > Cheers, > Dan > > _______________________________________________ > pmwiki-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users >
_______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
