On 7/24/07, Mike Shanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > > > > I don't think it's a great idea to use the heading text to generate > > the label. My recommendation is to enumerate them instead. If we worry > > that an enumerated heading becomes incorrect if a heading is inserted > > before it, remember that a similar thing happens if you change the > > heading text. > > > I think this is an excellent suggestion. But there is a way to get > around having "fidgety numbers". Perhaps it could organize by heading > intensity (H1-H6) and it's number in a hierarchy, such as: > > [[#123]] = The 3rd H3 in the 2nd H2 in the 1st H1. > [[#601]] = The 1st H3 in the 6th H1. (the 0 is for a missing H2). > > What do you think? > > -Mike >
In order to follow anchor syntax definition, you should take care that they begin with a letter as for example: [[#h123]] = The 3rd H3 in the 2nd H2 in the 1st H1. [[#h601]] = The 1st H3 in the 6th H1. (the 0 is for a missing H2). -- Dominique _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
