On 8/1/07, Petko Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello list. > > Just letting you know that the w3 HTML validador [1] had recently its engine > rewritten and now it invalidates more webpages because it finds more errors > than before. Notably, the current PmWiki skin needs to be fixed [2] by > replacing <html> with <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>. Probably > other skins and websites that you manage need upgrades -- I had to fix this > on non-pmwiki sites too, hopefully only the skins. > > Have fun, > Petko > > [1] http://validator.w3.org/ > [2] http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fpmwiki.org >
I was just toying with the skin test page [1] in order to embed a link to check the page validity, trying to write this as: Look %newwin% [[http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri={$ScriptUrl}?n={*$FullName}&skin={$Skin}|here]] what the W3C Markup Validation Service says about this page... and just found that the resulting url may not be always valid. BTW, the validator is eating the &skin=... specification as one of its own parameters and drop it as unhandled stuff. I manage to have it work thanks to PmWiki understanding both '?' and '&' as url parameter separator and not the validator. Anyway, this would be better to have some kind of dedicated Markup expression to handle this such as: {(urlencode http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki)} http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pmwiki.org%2Fwiki Should I open a PITS entry for this? [1] http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/SkinTest-Compact [2] http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PmWiki/PageVariables -- Dominique _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
