Hi Benoir ! Ok, so I see I'm a little bit late ... :-) (my excuse: was offline during holidays)
Well, as I wrote I'll will join the maintainance as far as I can (php coding and docs). How will the connection between the Pmwiki.org cookbook-recipe for ZAPForms and the new website be done ? I've found installation files on the new website, this has to be kept in synch with the cookbok-recipe, right ? I think keeping the up to date docs in the new wiki is a good idea, but we then should also remove old stuff from the cookbook and point to the doc-website (if this is ok for Pm) As I said, I want to stay with Pmwiki (that's a must for me !:-), so any develepment should be done in accordance with the pmwiki-philosiphy (I read a lot of the discussions about zapwiki in the maillist). My intention of using ZAPForm in pmwiki is to add Form-Support for some pmwiki-groups / pages, not to replace core pmwiki-functions (I wrote some modules in the past but had to find out by time, that they were incorporated into pmwiki before I even could introduce my ideas here in the list - and the core function are all better than mine !). As I write some days before I want to implement some If ZAPForms are maintained, I think it's vital to change the recipe according to changes in pmwiki regarding Form-Processing, i.e. if pmwiki supports (new) form processing features in the future, the corresponding ZAPForm-functions should be migrated accordingly using the new pmwiki-features. so again: I would like to join ! cheers Knut PS: I did not follow the lists entry about the development of the PmForm module. How is the status ? Benoit Dutilleul schrieb: > Hello Knut, > > Ben Stallings and myself were also eager to maintain the documentation. > Ben is also interested and capable of maintaining the software. > I've set up a documentation site : zapdoc.web-farm.org > <http://zapdoc.web-farm.org> and I have renamed all the pages of the > support group + checked most links. > > Maybe we could do the documentation/support/maintenance and perhaps > further developments together? Dan has been supportive and happy about > our initiative and, as always, I am pretty sure that he will be very > helpful. Ideally, our team would be capable of implementing new features > of zapwiki for zap. > > I look forward to reading your opinion on this. Kind regards, > > Benoit > _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
