Kathryn Andersen wrote: > >> A good tool if you're the only one preparing >> the HTML file. Not so good if you let everyone use it. > > It was written with the intent to make things easier if you already have > HTML files that you don't (yet) want to convert to PmWiki format. It > was NOT intended to replace PmWiki pages altogether. It's more oriented > towards using PmWiki as a CMS rather than a free-for-all wiki. > > There are trade-offs in using it. > > Kathryn Andersen > (author of IncludeUpload)
Kathryn, I don't want imply this recipe isn't great; it fills a real need. (And if I ever stop procrastinating and start writing again, I'll use it on my own site. One less conversion to deal with. Now if only Word or OpenOffice would produce nice, clean HTML,...) I'm just over-cautious about recommending something which someone might assume it's safer than it was designed to be. I've added your comments here to the page under "Warning", as well as clarifying that <head> is stripped out. Cheers! Sandy _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
