Monday, December 17, 2007, 11:19:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > One would argue, though, that: > a) history also reports "spammers", which are most probably not to be included > b) somebody might adopt (at least on some pages) an "expiration" > method for history: thus the list of contributors will result cropped > somehow, while their work might well have been considerable and > consolidated in the page text.
> For this reason, I think that just scanning the history would not make > justice. You are right! But it is the best we have. And it may be useful in some circumstances, but not in all, as you say. ~Hans _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
