"Remove" is definitely better than "hide". I still like cut and cutline because it's semantically clearer. Cut could be anything the user chooses - from a single character to the whole page (if you are allowing it to go beyond one line). Cutline, however, is obviously line-oriented.
What I don't like about "cutline" is that it's verbose. You could use "cut" for lines and "snip" for text within lines, since snip is more diminutive suggesting a smaller cut. But I think the precision of "cutline" is more important. For example, I would never have guessed that "cut" means to cut a line. Whatever you call it, it's going to be valuable recipe! Randy On Jan 21, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Hans wrote: > Sunday, January 20, 2008, 8:48:52 PM, Randy wrote: > >> One suggestion: > >> "Hide" implies that the text is still present. I would rename what >> you >> are calling "Hide" to "Cut" and rename your old "Cut" to "CutLine". > > Thanks! Perhaps. Or 'cut' and 'remove'? > cut for cutting out lines, and > remove for removing specific text from lines? > > > ~Hans > _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
