Charles Little wrote: > That could cause problems to existing sites, and doesn't correct anything, > merely covers it up. This doesn't seem like a bug as much as a design flaw.. > Perhaps something needs to be added to the tag to allow the person doing the > markup to specify that this particular instance is an override. > > Thoughts? >
First, Pm never changes anything that affects the behaviour of existing sites without consulting this group; he does not change simply for change's sake. Even if it's unanimous that the new way is better, he always puts in a flag so you can still have the old behaviour. Just one of the many little things that makes PmWiki such a nice program for real world users. Second, for nested pages, my vote would be the "outer" or main page wins. If A (:includes B:) and B (:includes C:), A would win. Third, for non-nested pages, first makes more sense to me. I put (:title:) at the top of every page, with what my English teacher called the topic paragraph. However, I can't think of a case other than (:include:) where having more than one (:title:) is intended. Sandy _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
