>Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 15:24:03 +0200 >From: marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release? >To: [email protected] >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >Patrick R. Michaud said... > >> Would the community prefer that I go ahead and issue a 2.2.0 >> release now, with the understanding that the remaining RoadMap >> features will appear in a later minor release? Or should I >> continue to hold the "beta" designation until those later >> features are done? > >Yes. You could have done he same a year ago ;-) > >Most stable beta I've ever run. > >-- >Cheers, >Marc > I agree. It has also been a stable beta for long enough that most cookbook recipes are now compatible with the changes made in the 2.2 series. But if I could make one request...
http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PITS/00984 This is a 3 line non-intrusive change to scripts/pagelist.php that will stop PublishPDF users from having to patch the pmwiki core. That would make my day! In most cases, one interprets 'beta' as 'buggy' whereas I agree with Marc that beta 65 is more stable than many non-beta software products. -- JR -- John Rankin \_ \) \,\__/7 / / ( c' \ / /, /_/ | & * Wellington ) / / /, / ( | / \__/ V _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
