At 11:31 AM 6/23/2008, you wrote: >Monday, June 23, 2008, 3:57:38 PM, Mailinglists wrote: >> The reason I didn't use AuthUser in the first place was to avoid >> the need for both a username and password. For my purposes just a >> password is more desirable. I may try a variation and just create an >> "if...then" kind of sequence where I check the password entered and redirect >> to the appropriate page. >If you have a 'Client' page with a number of links to each user's >page, say in a 'Profiles' group, you could simply write the links like >* [[Profiles.ClientA?action=login| ClientA ]] >* [[Profiles.ClientB?action=login| ClientB ]]
I was trying to do both, not have a client page where all were listed but instead just show a login and then redirect. This is just for a single page for each client. The rest of the site, all other pages, are wide open. That way one client wouldn't see the list of all other clients. >Otherwise you would need to create a conditional on the password >entered. But this is normally not available for security reasons. That is what I was thinking I could do, but I guess you saying the password is not exposed for use in a conditional without modification? This is low security situation. It is just something to make the client feel special and give a small sense of privacy. We just put proofs and samples on these pages, nothing sensitive. Thanks again. > ~Hans _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
