Hi All,

From a maintenance point of view, I would go for the "Localization:" prefix.

But reading the other suggestions, I like the proposal from Dave to prefix all
PmWiki groups with Pm, and the the proposal from PM to use "L10n".
In the end the standard abbreviation for "Localization" (or "Localisation") is L10n,
and is better than "Local" that could be interpreted in other ways.
So combined this would be "PmL10n:".
If this proposal wins, I would like to move the group itself also to "PmL10n/".

Regards,
Patrik

----- Original Message ----- From: "Petko Yotov" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 5:19 PM
Subject: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Localization InterMap


Hello. I'd like to read some comments about adding to a future PmWiki version a "Localization:" prefix to the default list of intermap links, pointing to
the Localization/ group on PmWiki.org.

The Localization/ group contains information and help for translators. An
intermap prefix will make it easier to link pages in it from both the default
documentation and the language translations.

There are different propositions for a prefix - the one I currently like the most is "Localization:", even if there is a risk that an existing wiki could
have a legitimate use of such a prefix, much like the "Cookbook:" prefix,
pointing to a different location. (The "default" intermap links are not
overridden by [[Site.InterMap]] entries, it is slightly more complex to change
them.)

If you have some comments, please reply here in the mailing list, or on this
page in the PITS : http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PITS/01180 .

Thanks,
Petko





_______________________________________________
pmwiki-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users

Reply via email to