> >>About 4]+5], the (:noleft:) feature in a table-less skin may require some >> CSS >>injection, either inline in the html page, or via a <link/> to an >> additional > > Indeed, the ability to suppress sections makes a CSS implementation > harder. Thanks for the reminder.
Agreed. Maybe a little pragmatism would be wise. While avoiding tables when css offer a better solution is a Good Thing, if the code for a table-less design is more complex (and maybe less reliable) than using a table, why choose complexity over simplicity? It would be better to adopt a pure css design because "the css solution is better" rather than because "tables are a Bad Thing." In design matters, I believe there is a saying that if you choose to break the rules, that's OK, but you need to know what the rules are and why you are breaking them. JR -- John Rankin _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
