On 10/1/11, V.Krishn <[email protected]> wrote: > On Saturday, October 01, 2011 10:36:40 AM Carlos AB wrote: >> Pehaps just using a markup for each html meta entry or one markup that >> covers all options in one markup. >> >> (:facebookmeta name=??? description=??? image=??? :) > > Perhaps > > (:extrameta facebook name=??? description=??? image=??? :) > (:extrameta googleplus name=??? description=??? image=??? :) > OR > (:meta facebook name=??? description=??? image=??? :) > > meta - directive namespace > facebook - scope > > This would leave possibility for any future addition using same > namespace(extrameta/meta) and making the tag easy to remember. > > -- > Regards, > V.Krishn
That could work too, but the thing is that you will have to write extra code for each scope, like a recipe for the recipe, so I believe it is more pratical/easy to have the directive-namespace+scope to form a single recipe, that does just one thing. But it is not so diffcult to do your way too. Regards, CarlosAB _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
