John Rankin (2011-10-31 16:06): > On 31/10/11 11:41 AM, Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote: > >John Rankin (2011-10-31 09:30): > >>>I agree. [[Link|text|title]] is nicer in a vacuum, ... > >>How would you write the equivalent of [[Link"title"]]? I'm not sure > >>that [[Link|Link|title]] is "nicer". You couldn't write > >>[[Link||title]] -- try [[Link|]] to see why. > >For the arguments sake: > >1. [[Link|]] works just fine: it creates<a href="...Link"></a> > >2. [[Link||title]] would create<a href="...Link" title="title"></a> > > > Yes, that is exactly my point. The examples show why [[Link"title"]] > is a better markup than [[Link|Link|title]], in my view. Link text > and title text are independent data items, so we should not need to > specify one in order to specify the other. The markup Petko proposes > is in that sense better, as you can specify one, the other, or both. > With the alternative proposal, you can specify link text without > title text, but not vice versa. > > Sorry I wasn't clear.
No no, I was lacking the insight. On the other hand, how useful is the empty link generated by [[Link|]]? [[Link||title]] could be the same as [[Link]] (with added title). But yeah, this markup just lost consistency points. -- -- Rogutės Sparnuotos _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
