>> I'd like to have some arguments from the community why we should or
>> shouldn't have a dedicated Skins/ group.
> In favor of a separate Skins group. Possibly either Skins, or maybe PmSkins. 
> In general Skins are different to Cookbooks. Skins affect UI, cookbooks 
> provide functionality. I can see some lengthy arguments that skins also 
> provide functionality, but across the web, we've settled on separate skins 
> and some sort of cookbook/module terminology.

I do fully agree, but want to ask this question anyways… What about recipes 
that are somewhere in the middle? E. g. bundles of themes/skins and 
modules/plugins (skins and other cookbook recipes in current PmWiki 
terminology).

>> Thinking more globally, should we do something for the other languages,
>> especially, should we have a SkinsFr/ and a CookbookFr/ WikiGroups for
>> the French language pages (among 20 languages)?
> Not in favor of this. Why not handle languages with categories?

Because categories are for content groups (e. g. blog recipes, cms recipes, 
etc), whereas content is a modality (as the same page in other languages does 
not contain different content).

> 
> 
>> If so, should we have separate *-Talk and *-Users pages for the other
>> language versions? Or we could have a global Talk/ and Users/ wikigroups
>> automatically related to all CookbookBg/ and CookbookDe/ pages which are
>> just versions of the Cookbook/ page in English. (Moving existing *-Users
>> pages to a different group will be done automatically, not manually.)
> Also not in favor. Number of groups is just going to get exponentially large, 
> and likely psychologically confusing to users... to what benefit, over 
> categories?

What about comments in several languages? mix them on the *-Talk pages?
_______________________________________________
pmwiki-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users

Reply via email to