Debate over the Status of Shi'ites in Egypt

By L. Azuri*

To view this Special Dispatch in HTML, visit: 
http://www.memri.org/bin/opener_latest.cgi?ID=IA31106 .

Recent statements in Cairo by Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi sparked public debate 
over the status of the Shi'ites in Egypt. Al-Qaradhawi said that the increasing 
infiltration of Shi'ite Islam into Egypt, which is predominantly Sunni, may 
lead to a civil war like the one in Iraq. This statement was denounced by 
Egyptian Shi'ites, as well as by the religious establishment in Egypt and by 
columnists in the Egyptian press. Conversely, there were some who supported 
Al-Qaradhawi's position, saying that the spread of Shi'ism constituted a threat 
to Egypt and to the region as a whole.


Introduction: The Status of the Shi'ites in Egypt

There are no official statistics on the number of Shi'ites in Egypt. The Ibn 
Khaldun Research Center in Cairo estimated in January 2005 that the Shi'ites 
make up about 1% of the country's Muslim population, which in turn constitutes 
approximately 90% of Egypt's overall population of 73 million. According to 
this estimate, Egypt has some 657,000 Shi'ite citizens.(1) Leaders of the 
Shi'ite community in Egypt explain that the exact number of Shi'ites in the 
country is hard to estimate because many of them practice takiyya - i.e. hide 
their sectarian identity in order to avoid persecution.(2) Egyptian human 
rights organizations report that the country's Shi'ite citizens are denied 
basic human rights like freedom of expression and freedom of assembly, and are 
persecuted by the security apparatuses.(3) 

Muhammad Al-Darini, a Sunni who converted to Shi'ism and now serves as chairman 
of the Higher Council for the Protection of Ahl Al-Bayt in Egypt,(4) said that, 
according to the estimate of the Egyptian security apparatuses, there are about 
one million Shi'ites in Egypt, hiding behind 76 Sufi orders,(5) while he 
himself believes that their number is closer to 1.5 million.(6) 

In an interview for the website www.alarabiya.net, Al-Darini said, "The large 
number of Shi'ites [in Egypt] today stems from [the fact that] many Egyptian 
Sunnis are converting to Shi'ism. This is due to the information, technology, 
and Internet revolution, to the many [new] books pouring [into Egypt], and to 
[the activities of] the Higher Council for the Protection of Ahl Al-Bayt which 
has been operating for eight years and publishing the paper Sawt Ahl 
Al-Bayt..." Al-Darini added that the Shi'ite community does not expose itself 
"because it fears the persecution which has been the Shi'ites' lot in the past 
25 years. Suffice it to mention [all] the [Shi'ites] who were arrested and 
tortured [in Egypt] in 1988-1989, 1994, 1996, 2000, and 2002-2004... [as well 
as] the hostility that is being spread by thousands of shari'a associations 
that endorse wahhabi Islam, and the violent groups that come out against the 
Shi'ites with all their might..."

Al-Darini told the website that he had been arrested and imprisoned for a year 
and a half for spreading Shi'ite propaganda. In prison, he reported, there were 
"[special] sessions for Shi'ite prisoners, aimed at converting them back to the 
Sunna in return for their release... [These Shi'ite prisoners] were arrested 
[simply] for belonging to the Shi'ite [community]. After six months of 
negotiations, the [authorities] agreed to release them on condition that they 
return to the Sunna, and they succumbed to these pressures..." Al-Darani added 
that he had refused to accept these terms, and said: "[The authorities] said 
they would release me [only] if I stopped the activities of the Higher Council 
for the Protection of Ahl Al-Bayt... They also prevented me from publishing our 
newspaper... I am the only prisoner in Egypt who has [ever] been labeled 
'especially dangerous.' Even Sadat's assassins did not receive such a label... 
The Ministry of Religious Endowments is still holding the Council's property, 
including computers, papers and documents... even personal documents like birth 
certificates."(7)


Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi: Shi'ite Infiltration of Egypt Will Ignite a Blaze That 
Will Destroy Everything in Its Path 

Most of the debate regarding the status of the Shi'ites in Egypt was sparked by 
Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi's statement which warned against the infiltration of 
Shi'ite Islam into Sunni countries, and vice versa. In an August 2006 speech to 
the Egyptian Journalists' Union, delivered in Cairo immediately after the end 
of the Lebanon war, Al-Qaradhawi said that there was need for rapprochement 
between Shi'ites and Sunnis. He stressed, however, that "this rapprochement 
[must not be] a pretext for Shi'ite infiltration of the Sunni countries. [Such 
infiltration] will ignite a blaze that will destroy everything [in its path], 
and what has happened in Iraq between Shi'ite and Sunnis will [repeat itself] 
in all other countries... Rapprochement between the [two] sects requires that 
each of them refrain from [conducting] missionary activities in countries that 
adhere to the other."(8) 

According to the Egyptian daily Al-Masri Al-Yawm, Al-Qaradhawi "warned against 
Shi'ite infiltration of Egypt," and said that the Shi'ites "are trying to 
spread their beliefs in Egypt owing to its love for Ahl Al-Bayt, and because 
Egypt has [many places holy to the Shi'a], such as the tomb of Hussein and 
Zaynab." According to the daily, Al-Qaradhawi also stated that "the Shi'ites 
use Sufism as a bridge to Shi'ism, and have been exploiting it in recent years 
to infiltrate Egypt..."(9) 

Al-Qaradhawi's statements drew criticism from Sunnis and Shi'ites alike. This 
prompted the International Council of Muslim Clerics, which Al-Qaradhawi heads, 
to issue a clarification saying that "the statements that have been attributed 
to Al-Qaradhawi... [were part of] an answer to a question that had been posed 
to him, and his answer was influenced by the context and phrasing of the 
question. Al-Qaradhawi's words were not meant as an accusation against the 
Sufis or against Sufism as such, [contrary to what was] understood by some 
conference participants and by some who read the [subsequent] reports... 
[Al-Qaradhawi] believes in the need for national unity. [He believes] that 
Twelver Shi'ism is one of the [legitimate] sects of Islam and that the Ja'fari 
school of thought is a respected Islamic school of thought... [In speaking 
against Shi'ites who attempt to convert Sunnis], Al-Qaradhawi was referring to 
the irresponsible attempts of certain individuals who sow division and civil 
strife among the Muslims by spreading Shi'ism in countries that are mostly 
Sunni, or by trying to spread [various] Sunni denominations in countries whose 
population is mostly Shi'ite..."(10)


Egyptian Shi'ites Denounce Al-Qaradhawi's Statements

Dr. Ahmad Rasem Al-Nafis, a former Sunni who converted to Shi'ism and was 
arrested for it in 1987 and in 1989, came out strongly against Al-Qaradhawi's 
statements.(11) In an editorial published in the Egyptian Culture Ministry 
weekly Al-Kahira, he wrote: "Alas, it turns out that [Egypt] is the land [of 
the Sunnis] and not our land, and that whoever has converted to Shi'ism and who 
follows the ways of the Shi'a should give up his Egyptian citizenship out of 
his own free will.... before Al-Qaradhawi's Taliban state takes it away from 
him... Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi felt no qualms about [uttering words of] sectarian 
incitement when he warned against the spread of Shi'ism in Egypt... Then he 
went on to incite against Sufism... How has Shi'ism [come to be seen as] 
opposed to the love of Ahl Al-Bayt? What proof and confirmation does 
[Al-Qaradhawi] have for this nonsense, and who gave him the right to judge 
[our] intentions and examine our [aims]?... We would like to bring it to [the 
Sheikh's] attention that the Shi'ites in Egypt have no militia... so there is 
no cause to fear them. [On the contrary], it is others who inspire fear: those 
armed with an immense arsenal of fatwas accusing [others] of heresy..."(12)

Al-Darini also criticized Al-Qaradhawi's remarks. He told the website 
www.alarabiya.net: "Al-Qaradhawi's statements constitute clear and blatant 
incitement against Ahl Al-Bayt in Egypt, since they go hand in hand with 
[certain] practical steps taken by the government, which, among other things, 
has instructed the preachers in the mosques to incite against Ahl Al-Bayt in 
general, and against the Shi'ites in particular... How is it that we constantly 
speak of freedom and its implications, while at the same time, we disregard the 
fact that the foundation of this freedom, and of international rules and 
customs, is respect for the individual's [freedom] to worship God in his own 
unique manner? Why raise the issue of [a person's] Shi'ite or Sunni [identity]? 
No man - be he Sunni, Shi'ite or anything else - is a viceroy of Allah who can 
judge [people] for their beliefs in this world..."(13) 

Al-Darini also said: "We Egyptian Shi'ites suffer from [the fact that] many 
accuse us of having ties with Iran. We are not spreading Iran's word, and these 
fears have no grounding in reality... It has become a habit with the Sunni 
Muslims that whenever a Shi'ite is mentioned, Iran is [also] mentioned. We 
receive no support and no assistance from Iran... It has no influence over us. 
[On the contrary], Iran has criticized us harshly for some of the statements we 
have made..."(14)


Egypt's Religious Establishment Calls for Sunni-Shi'ite Rapprochement 

The Egyptian Ministry of Religious Endowments and Al-Azhar University also took 
part in the debate. In an interview for the daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, Egyptian 
Minister of Religious Endowments Dr. Hamdi Zaqzouq said: "Egypt is among the 
leading countries in terms of rapprochement between religious sects... Al-Azhar 
University teaches some doctrines of Shi'ite scholars alongside those of Sunni 
scholars. It is always said that the Egyptians are among those who feel the 
greatest love for Ahl Al-Bayt, even though they are not Shi'ite. Egypt is a 
country of tolerance and acceptance of others..."(15)

The Sheikh of Al-Azhar, Dr. Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, said to Al-Sharq Al-Awsat: 
"We have said again and again that the dispute between the Sunna and the Shi'a 
is a dispute over details, not over the tenets of the faith. Anyone who 
proclaims that there is no God but Allah is a believing Muslim. We support any 
call for rapprochement between the Muslim sects. Al-Azhar made this call a long 
time ago, and it is time, I think, for those who take care of the Muslims' 
affairs around the world to endorse this call, in order to preserve Muslim 
unity and prevent disintegration..."(16) 

As part of its efforts towards Sunni-Shi'ite rapprochement, Al-Azhar is 
examining the possibility of forming a rapprochement committee in partnership 
with Iran. Sheikh Mahmoud 'Ashur of the Academy for Islamic Studies said to the 
Egyptian daily Al-Masri Al-Yawm that Al-Azhar has contacted several Iranian 
figures, including Sheikh Abdallah Al-Qummi, with the aim of re-establishing 
the Committee for Rapprochement Between the Islamic Sects, which was closed 
down after the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979. He added that "all 
[activities on this front] are conducted with the knowledge of the senior 
Al-Azhar [scholars], and especially [with the knowledge of] its Sheikh, 
Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi..."(17)

At the same time, however, Al-Azhar is cooperating with the security 
apparatuses in their attempts to shut down the paper Ahl Al Bayt, which has a 
Twelver Shi'ite orientation, claiming that it "denies many tenets of the Sunni 
faith, attacks the companions of the Prophet,... tries to inculcate Shi'ite 
thought in Egypt, and generates confusion."(18) The Egyptian press reports that 
the Shi'ites in Egypt are trying to launch five additional papers, at a total 
cost of some $10 million, but that the state authorities will probably refuse 
to license their publication.(19) 


Egyptian Journalist Critical of Al-Qaradhawi's Statements: "No One Political 
View is Shared by All Shi'ites" 

Among the Egyptian journalists who criticized Al-Qaradhawi's remarks was Osama 
Al-Ghazouli, who wrote in the Egyptian weekly Roz Al-Yousef: "Al-Qaradhawi's 
statements [run counter to] Egypt's national culture, which cannot be reduced 
to the positions of the Muslim Brotherhood and to its political views regarding 
[various] faiths. The mindset of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is [the mindset] 
reflected by Al-Qaradhawi's [statement], is based on dualism. Everything seen 
in terms of two opposing camps: Humanity [consists of] Muslims and infidels; 
the Muslims [are divided into] Sunnis and Shi'ites, and the Sunnis [are divided 
into those who support] the [Muslim] Brotherhood versus the enemies [of the 
Muslim Brotherhood]. The two camps [must] fight until one or both of them 
perish. This dichotomous view of the world is also shared by two [other] 
gentlemen who cause trouble and embarrassment in the world: Osama bin Laden and 
George Bush...

"But reality [shows] that there is no one political view that is shared by all 
the Shi'ites [who live in] different countries, with different languages and 
different circumstances... The Muslims - Shi'ite and Sunni [alike] - must 
pursue the path of parliamentary democracy, each people according to the 
methods that it wishes to adopt and which suit its national agenda..."(20) 

Muhammad Foda, former editor of the Egyptian government daily Al-Masaa, wrote 
in his daily column: "What is it that compels [us Egyptians] to become so 
preoccupied with marginal issues that we ignore the essential issues?... 
Suddenly the issue of the Sunna and the Shi'a has come up... Why is that? The 
Sunna and the Shi'a have existed for over 1,000 years. Egypt follows the Sunni 
denomination, but that does not preclude the existence of a Shi'ite minority. 
So why does this issue have to burst open now? Who benefits from these 
arguments? In other words, is there some external force that, unbeknownst to 
us, compels us to blow our society apart from within?..."(21)


Egyptian Journalists Supporting Al-Qaradhawi's Position


*Muhammad 'Ali Ibrahim: Iran is Trying to Impose Shi'ism upon the Entire Region

Other Egyptian columnists endorsed Al-Qaradhawi's position and warned of the 
spread of Shi'ism in Egypt. Muhammad 'Ali Ibrahim, chief editor of the Egyptian 
government daily Al-Gumhouriyya, wrote: "Iran has recently set out on a 
religious-political campaign to convert Sunnis to Shi'ism, [exploiting] the 
wave of sympathy for Hizbullah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah in his war 
against Israel..." Ibrahim added that Iran has chosen Syria as the starting 
point of this campaign, owing to Syria's geographic proximity to Iran, and 
since it is ruled by an 'Alawi minority which, in his opinion, will not oppose 
an attempt to convert the Syrian population to Shi'ism. "Iran," he wrote, 
"gives $200 a month to Sunni citizens [who agree to convert]. It chooses these 
citizens carefully. First of all, they must be imams of Sunni mosques. 
Secondly, they must have at least three children. And thirdly, [they must be 
individuals] who wish to make a pilgrimage to the Ka'ba in Mecca, or to perform 
the 'umra [pilgrimage to Mecca not during the Hajj] but lack the financial 
means to do so... 

"However, there is no doubt that Egypt, citadel of the Sunna, is still in 
fairly good condition... We wish to expose the grave [phenomenon] of exploiting 
the religious sects for political purposes, and to warn against a Shi'ite 
takeover of the Arab media... Iran is now marketing to the Arab world the 
notion of 'political salvation' through adoption of the Shi'a. At this stage, 
[offering] this political salvation to the Arab world is a primary goal of 
Iran's. However, this is not [Iran's] real goal. Its real, secret [goal] is to 
completely eliminate the Sunni community, from the ocean to the Gulf..."(22) 


*Mahmoud 'Amer: "We Must Be More Wary of the Shi'ites Than of the Jews"

In an article published in the weekly Roz Al-Yousef, Mahmoud 'Amer wrote that 
the Shi'a poses a religious and security threat that could undermine the 
Egyptian regime: "When the official religious establishment in Egypt publishes 
announcements in support of the Shi'ites and declares that the Shi'ite 
denomination is equal [in status] to the Sunni, this is a serious religious and 
security threat. In religious terms, the tenets of the Iranian Shi'ite school 
of thought are not identical to the tenets of the school that we Egyptian 
Sunnis [follow]. [So] our disagreement with the Shi'a is a disagreement over 
principles, not details... As for the security risk, it stems from the fact 
that the followers of Shi'ism recognize only a government [that is associated] 
with their faith. Therefore, those who convert to Shi'ism in Egypt are loyal to 
Iran, and only to Iran... The flag of Shi'ism has [now] been raised in Egypt, 
700 years after Salah Al-Din Al-Ayyubi managed [to cast it down]. Who stands to 
gain from this?...

"Imagine a [community] in Egypt that does not recognize the leadership of the 
imam Caliph Abu Bakar, descendent of the Prophet Muhammad...(23) Will [these 
people] recognize the leadership of [Egyptian] President Mubarak? The security 
[apparatuses] must therefore be aware that the loyalty of every Shi'ite... is 
given to Tehran, Qom, and Najaf. In other words, his loyalty lies with [Iranian 
President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad and Hassan Nasrallah, rather than with President 
Mubarak, since hakimiyya [the rule of God], or imamiyya [the rule of an imam 
descended from 'Ali], is the most important tenet of their faith, and the dream 
of every Egyptian who has converted to Shi'ism is [to witness in Egypt] a 
revolution similar to Khomeini's [Islamic Revolution in Iran]...

"Iranian Twelver Shi'ism agreed with the Hawarij(24) in accusing the companions 
of the Prophet of heresy and in [waging] an armed struggle against the [Muslim] 
leaders. We must be more wary of the Shi'ites than of the Jews, because the 
matter of the Jews is well known, and their deceitful deeds are known from the 
Koran and the Sunna, as well as from modern history... But as for the Shi'a, it 
may influence people through lies and deceit, under the pretense of protecting 
Ahl Al-Bayt - because most Egyptians have a particular affection for Ahl 
Al-Bayt, and this makes it easy to influence them and thus introduce Shi'ism 
into Egyptian homes. 

"In time, Egypt will turn into another Iraq, especially since Iran has hopes 
regarding Al-Azhar, which was originally established by the Fatimides to 
disseminate Batinite Shi'ism [whose adherents believe in seeking the hidden 
meanings of the Koranic text], until Salah Al-Ayyubi purged it of Shi'ism, 
[replacing it with] Sunni denominations..."(25) 


A Third Option - Islam Without Shi'a and Sunna

Egyptian author and intellectual Salah Al-Wardani is the founder of an 
association called "New Discourse," which advocates a universal Islam and the 
elimination of the Sunni-Shi'ite distinction. Al-Wardani was born to a Sunni 
family, but in 1985, when he was in his twenties, he converted to Shi'ism and 
subsequently wrote a great deal in praise of Shi'ism and against Sunni Islam. 
Twenty-one years later, he declared that he no longer belonged to either sect. 
In an interview for Al-Masri Al-Yawm, he called on intellectuals to join his 
association.(26) In explaining his position, he said: "I have now emerged from 
both circles (Shi'ite and Sunni Islam) into a new circle, or a third tier... I 
call for a new Islamic discourse based on the Koran and on reason, which 
transcends the old mindset that is [still] dominant among the Muslims today... 
I call [to rely on] modern reason... Islam is not meant to have sects..."(27)


*L. Azuri is a research fellow at MEMRI.

Endnotes:
(1) http://annabaa.org/nbanews/44/093.htm .
(2) Al-Ahram Weekly (Egypt), October 19, 2006.
(3) http://www.eipr.org/reports/04/rep2.htm ; 
http://www.hrinfo.org/hotcase/04/pr040420.shtml.
(4) Ahl Al-Bayt ("the descendents of the Prophet Muhammad") are revered in 
Islam in general, but have a special status in the Shi'a, which regards them as 
the only legitimate heirs of the Prophet. The Higher Council for the Protection 
of Ahl Al-Bayt in Egypt is a body that includes representatives of the sharifs 
(the descendants of the Prophet), and of the Sufis and of the Shi'ites.
(5) http://www.wikalah.net/news/906/23_egypt.htm, September 23, 2006.
(6) Al-Arabiyya (Egypt), September 26, 2006.
(7) Al-Arabiyya (Egypt), September 26, 2006.
(8) http://www.qardawi.net, September 2, 2006.
(9) Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), September 2, 2006.
(10) http://www.iumsonline.net, September 4, 2006.
(11) For more information about Al-Nafis, see 
http://www.14masom.com/leqaa/47/47.htm.
(12) Al-Kahira (Egypt), September 12, 2006.
(13) Al-Arabiyya (Egypt), September 5, 2006.
(14) Al-Arabiyya (Egypt), September 26, 2006.
(15) Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), September 21, 2006.
(16) Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), November 2, 2006.
(17) Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), November 20, 2006.
(18) 'Aqidati (Egypt), November 28, 2006.
(19) Al-Misriyyun (Egypt), November 24, 2006.
(20) Roz Al-Yousef (Egypt), September 15, 2006.
(21) Al-Masaa (Egypt), October 29, 2006.
(22) Al-Gumhouriyya (Egypt), October 26, 2006.
(23) The Shi'ites believe that the rightful religious leader of the Muslims 
must be descended from the Prophet's son-in law 'Ali. 
(24) The Hawarij were a Muslim sect which split off from the camp of the Fourth 
Caliph 'Ali ibn 'Abi Taleb, whom the Shi'ites regard as a saint. The members of 
this sect held that any pious Muslim, not only a descendent of the Prophet 
Muhammad, can be a Caliph. 
(25) Roz Al-Yousef (Egypt), October 17, 2006.
(26) Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), November 2, 2006.
(27) Al-Misriyyun (Egypt), October 31, 2006.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to