??? How would you disprove something that HAS been "proven"? If it has been 
proven, and then disproved, then the method of proof (or the disproof) was 
invalid. One can ONLY disprove something that has not (validly) been proven. 
The method is to propose an hypothesis (which might advance to a theory), set 
conditions by which it would be proven OR disproven, and then to meet those 
conditions. One disproves an hypothesis by meeting a condition for its disproof.
Incidentally, if there are no conditions given (or implied) for the disproof of 
an hypothesis, then the hypothesis is NOT scientific.

John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                                  Hank: how 
would you try to "disprove s" something that hasn't been 'proven' a all? 
 Johm
   ----- Original Message ----- 
   From: adar 
   To: [email protected] 
   Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:11 AM
   Subject: [PNEWS-L] Irrationality is the Norm
 
 It would seem, would it not (at least more so to Europeans than to 
   Americans) that after several thousand years (perhaps 2,500 and more) that 
the 
   most enlightened minds would by now agree that it is very unlikely that god 
   exists and humans are made in "His" image or a "soul" exists and is immortal 
- 
   or that god is guiding the human species in some determined direction. That 
   would seem unlikely, wouldn't it?
 
 Science has been unable to definitively disprove the existence of god 
   but religionists fail in the most reasoned and ignore their own inability to 
do 
   the opposite - to provide evidence that god does exist. It seems that the 
   irrational is the norm and it matters little that those who believe in god 
   cannot prove god and truth or falsity is not part of this equation. They are 
so 
   sure of their unproven belief and often pious as well in that faith in the 
   unknown which they claim to know very well that some consider it offensive 
to 
   question god and disreputable to even make an attempt to prove the existence 
of 
   god.
 
 Many say it is "feelings" and feelings count ever bit as much as 
   evidential proof. They are incapable of seeing the deception. Why and how 
can 
   so many people be so convinced that they are willing to believe in something 
   they just feel is right but every bit of new data and science points toward 
an 
   opposite conclusion? They can and do so out of fear of death.
 
 Go here for more: http://pnews.org/bio/Liberalism.shtml
 
 Progressive News/Views (since 1982)
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
     
                       

       
---------------------------------
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, 
photos & more. 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to