This does not discount the possibility that the Arab "Palestinians" were 
nomadic. That is, the territory was their native territory, but they tended not 
to establish towns due to their nomadic nature. There are different concepts of 
how peoples connect themselves to the land. Land ownership and "imprinting" is 
NOT a universal concept. There is also the concept of "this is the land we 
USE", "this is the land by which we LIVE".
The reasoning used below to deny land from "Palestinians" is one of those used 
to deprive native Amerindindians of their lands. It is disrespectful, and it is 
wrong.

adar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                                  
 THESE ARE THE FACTS:
 
 ARABS were
 Invaders From the Desert - They established NO imprint on the land.
 
 Before Israeli independence, the Arabs only built one town
 in all of Palestine.
    ONLY ONE...
 
 "The feeling of so many nineteenth-century visitors that the country had been 
 waiting for the return of its lawful inhabitants was made the more significant 
 by the shallowness of the Arab imprint on the country. In twelve hundred years 
 of association, they build only a single town, Ramleh, established as the 
local 
 subprovincial capital in the eighth century. The researchers of the 
 nineteenth-century scholars, beginning with the archaeologist Edward Robinson 
 in 1838, revealed that hundreds of place-names of villages and sites, 
seemingly 
 Arab, were Arabic renderings or translations of ancient Hebrew names, biblical 
 or Talmudic. The Arabs have never even had a name of their own for this 
country 
 which they claim. "Filastin" is merely the Arab transliteration of 
"Palestine," 
 the name the Romans gave the country when they determined to obliterate the 
 "presence of the Jewish people." (Samuel Katz, "Battleground.." - 73)
 
 "Sir George Adam Smith, author of the "Historical Geography of the Holy Land," 
 wrote in 1891" `The principle of nationality requires their (the Turks') 
 dispossession. Nor is there any indigenous civilization in Palestine that 
could 
 take the place of the Turkish except that of the Jews who...have given to 
 Palestine everything it has ever had of value to the world.' This blunt 
 judgement was entirely normal; it aroused no objections and offended no one. 
It 
 was a simple statement of a unique and irrefutable fact. The Arabs's discovery 
 of Palestine came many years later." (Katz)
 
 It is an Arab myth that the Arabian Peninsula is a land where history begins 
 with Muhammad and Israel is not a real nation. Arabs insist Israel is on land 
 that belongs to them. Islam is a religion, not about peace, but about conquest 
 and plunder. When the Jews returned (and some were always there because they 
 never left) and built up the land it became once more a place to plunder. The 
 pre-modern Arab civilization brought with it a creed that has offered an 
 afterlife to people with nothing in this life.
 
 MORE:
 http://pnews.org/ArT/TrU/DesertInvaders.shtml
 
 Hank Roth
 http://pnews.org/
 
     
                       

       
---------------------------------
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, 
photos & more. 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to